Our Related Sites

Creative Mac

Animation Artist
Digital Animators

Digital Pro Sound

Digital Media Designer

Presentation Master

Digital Webcast

AV Video
Digital Post Production
Digital Producer
Digital Video Editing
DV Format
DVD Creation
Film & Video Magazine

Our Related User Forums
Creative Mac
View All Forums A-Z
Mac Sites We Like

Ramseeker PowerBook CentralMacinsteinLowEndMacMacs OnlyMacWindowsGo2MacMacSpeedzoneMacReviewzone

NEWS • Oct. 10, 2001
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Microsoft Antitrust Appeal
Redmond giant charged case tainted by original judge

by John Virata

The U.S Supreme Court today declined an appeal by Microsoft Corp. to overturn a ruling that it violated antitrust laws. The nation's highest court rejected, without comment, to review the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that found Microsoft acted illegally in maintaining its monopoly of computer operating systems. The Redmond, Wash.-based developer of the Windows operating system, Microsoft Office suite of productivity software, Internet Explorer web browser, and other software for both the enterprise and consumers, argued in its appeal to the Supreme Court that the ruling handed down by the original judge, District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, was tainted because of comments that Judge Jackson made after the trial, comments that Microsoft Corp. had viewed as derogatory to the company and its co-founder, Bill Gates.

Both the Department of Justice and Microsoft Corp. have been urged to settle the case by Nov. 2, and if no settlement is reached, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly will appoint a mediator to spur a settlement deal. If no deal is reached with the assistance of the mediator, Judge Kollar_Kotelly will hold hearings to determine what punishment, if any, will be imposed on Microsoft to prevent the company from engaging in future anti-competitive behavior.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]